August 25, 2015 Leave a comment
An international scavenger hunt
July 11, 2015 Leave a comment
Perhaps we can use our nation’s collective flag stocks as shrouds for people who have died from domestic violence or who have died because of a lack of funding to essential services.
June 23, 2015 Leave a comment
And here’s some of the Australian government’s dirty laundry this week:
And some general changes to legislation like:
When in doubt, call something a death cult and an enemy twice a day. It’s even more effective in shutting down debate than accusing someone of being the PC thought police and un-Australian.
Government is threatened with High Court Case that challenges the legality of imprisonment and processing of asylum seekers offshore and the legality of spending tax payers money to do so. Government rushes through amendments to the new Migration Act to retrospectively create new laws so that offshore processing and spending tax payers money cannot be challenged in the High Court.
Man, I wish I could just change the rules every time someone threatens to challenge me on anything. “Actually, no, sir. You may have written that coffee was $4.30 but see how I’ve just crossed out the price on the menu and replaced it with $1? I’m paying you $1. Pfft, never mind your reasoning behind the $4.30 or the consequences of my actions on your current staff.” Or, “Man, I know that you can probably prove that the ocean has water in it but I totally don’t want to think about how small and inadequate and possible incorrect that makes me and can you imagine all the textbooks we’re going to need to reprint and all the angry people who are going to yell at me, again? Actually, this whole thought process has been really inconvenient and expensive. Nope, I decree that the ocean is made up predominately of luminescent aardvarks and that you can never bring this up again. Oh and the nature of the ocean is a topic of national security and the space in which we become who we are as a nation so, no, really don’t bring it up again.”
June 6, 2015 Leave a comment
Australia’s brand new shining piece of legislation – Australian Border Force Act 2015. It is, as the Liberal and Labour Parties and Sky News would say, what the majority of people in Australia voted for. It combines customs, immigration and border protection under one department and commissioner with a great deal of power and a great deal less judicial oversight. Certain provisions of the Act, if appropriately implemented and regulated, could mean that individuals working in borders and immigration might actually be qualified for the tasks they are employed to do – a boon given that in the past Australian contractors have been employed in detention centres to deal with victims of war, trauma and rape with no formal qualifications or a Certificate II in Security. But then the Act defines secrecy and disclosure provisions not just for individuals working at sea but also for those managing and working with asylum seekers. Disclosure of information outside the provisions of the legislation may result in two years imprisonment. Criticisms of the Act include that: doctors, nurses and teachers who go public about inadequate management of abuses in detention centres may face two years imprisonment; guards and security forces could potentially beat asylum seekers to death with impunity.
The Act states that:
Immigration and Border Protection workers will make decisions that affect the safety, rights and freedoms of individuals as well as trade and commerce in Australia. They will hold a privileged place at the border and in the community, with access to secure environments and law enforcement databases. They will also exercise significant powers under the Customs Act 1901 , Migration Act 1958 and Maritime Powers Act 2012 and other Commonwealth law, such as detention, arrest, boarding a vessel, entry, search, questioning, seizure, use of force and removal from Australia. The community and government trust Immigration and Border Protection workers to exercise these powers reasonably, lawfully, impartially and professionally.
The Bill, therefore, contains a number of integrity provisions to increase resistance to criminal infiltration and corruption and to enhance government and public confidence in Immigration and Border Protection workers, as well as the confidence of other partners including intelligence organisations and foreign governments. The Bill also includes provisions that enable the setting of standards for a highly trained, disciplined and flexible workforce.
Australia’s choices to date in how it manages its borders and those individuals who choose to enter them have resulted in:
The above events came into public scrutiny due to journalism, whistleblowing, senate inquiries and lobbying. Are these the actions of government and industry that deserve trust and confidence? Or these?
The government’s commitment to secrecy should be a concern for everyone. Secrecy is completely inadequate for democracy but totally appropriate for tyranny. If the minister will not inform the public, then we are within our right to assume the worst. No free and fair nation operates with secrecy as a blanket policy position. Democracies are based on the foundation of public scrutiny and open government.
If, “in short, our border creates the space where we can be who we are and become who we want to be as a nation,” we should not keep what happens in that space a secret.
December 23, 2014 2 Comments
Australia’s prime minster’s greatest achievement as minister for women, repealing the carbon tax.
Thanks to the abolition of the carbon tax, depiction of basic female human function is no longer censored or enshrined in regulation as “abhorrent.”
October 28, 2012 1 Comment
Ah Noumea. We sailed through the Dunbar passage at the splendid hour of 5.30am. Sunrise coloured the waves in a photogenic manner. Forty minutes later I arrived on deck. It was still reasonably photogenic.
After a stroll around town and lunch at a patisserie, we embarked on a tour with wine and cheese. Our tickets stated that it was not a wine tasting tour. After a brief drive through town we arrived at a restaurant and were provided with three cheeses and three glasses of different wine to consume (but not taste). The consumption of cheese and wine was undertaken with grace and fortitude and delight. One could say it was a tasty experience.
Okay, this isn’t working for me. You see, we embarked on a tour but I feel quite conflicted about recording it. Our tour guide had not moved beyond his 1960s education and provided an unremittingly negative view of the Indigenous population. On one hand, I don’t expect everyone to have the same world view (some people find all of Today Tonight’s advice applicable to their life’s experiences). Our guide demonstrated one world view that is held by an expat Australian in Noumea. That’s an education in itself. Even with anonymity, I don’t know that it’s right to publicly humiliate the guy by quoting verbatim what he said then picking at it for posterity. On the other hand I’m still angry, embarrassed and disappointed that the view presented by our guide is what a bus load of people took home with them. With my third, equally attractive and functional hand, I lodged a complaint and expect that P&O’s internal processes will address the issue in a reasonable manner – the crew on the ship is made up of a dozen different nationalities. I hope changes are made with limited suffering.
Some background reading on New Caledonia
But what about now, you say?
January 26, 2012 2 Comments
I have spent Australia Day (also known as Invasion Day) catching up on housework and contemplating the more curly aspects of my day off. Earlier in the week, a number of my Aboriginal co-workers expressed their wish to work through the public holiday. The 26th January marks the arrival of the First Fleet to Australia, the declaration of British Sovereignty and a time of terrible, violent upheaval for Aboriginal people. But as Australia Day is a declared public holiday there are limitations and conditions placed on employers, such as penalty rates, that offer a disincentive to employ full staff numbers on public holidays (or, put another way, an incentive to employers to allow their staff to spend time with family and friends). Some members of our team do participate in Australia Day, some see it as a day of national pride while others have separated it from its historical and symbolic context and use the public holiday to share time with friends. Attempt have been made to change our national holiday to a day less contentious but without success. Reconciliation of differing individual and cultural perspectives is no easy thing, especially in practice.
At a very basic level, I’m just pleased to be home for more than two days in a row. And here are the flowers bought to mark this rare occurrence.